Benjamin Bonzi vs Patrick Zahraj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Bonzi has been more successful in winning points on their second serve, with a figure of 48.39%, compared to Zahraj's 42.34%. Does this provide an edge for Bonzi? It likely indicates stronger performance in this area.
• Return Game: Both players are nearly identical in their performance against second serves, with Zahraj slightly ahead at 48.63% versus Bonzi's 48.62%. However, Zahraj also leads in first serve returns at 26.63% compared to Bonzi's 24.5%, which may give Zahraj a slight edge in return games.
• Pressure Situations: Zahraj is slightly better at saving breakpoints, with a 56.18% success rate, compared to Bonzi's 52.55%. Does this suggest Zahraj is more adept under pressure? It seems to be the case.
• Overall Match Performance: Bonzi has a better overall win rate over the last year, with 66.67%, while Zahraj has won 55.95% of their matches. Could this indicate higher consistency for Bonzi? Likely so.
• Surface Preferences: Both players perform best on hard surfaces with a win rate of 65% for each, but Zahraj struggles more on grass, where Bonzi has better adaptability.
• Tournament Level Success: In higher-level Challengers and ITF tournaments over $10K, Bonzi has won 75% of their matches, whereas Zahraj won 57.69%, implying Bonzi may handle these tournaments better.
• Opponent Quality: Bonzi has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 200.36, as compared to Zahraj's average opponent rank of 393.96. Could this signal that Bonzi is better prepared for high-level adversaries?
• Deciding Sets: Zahraj seems to have the advantage in deciding sets, having won 59% of them in the past year, compared to Bonzi's 48% success in such scenarios.
• Break Point Conversion: Zahraj converts break points slightly more often at 34.25%, compared to Bonzi's 32.12%, potentially giving Zahraj an edge when key opportunities arise.

Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):

As we approach this matchup, a close examination of the statistics reveals some telling patterns. Bonzi's stronger overall win ratio and higher performance within more competitive tournament environments suggest a consistent and experienced player. Moreover, Bonzi has demonstrated resilience in tougher matches, often facing players with higher rankings.

On the other hand, Zahraj shows strength in pressure situations, notably in break point conversion and deciding sets. Zahraj's slight edge in returns and pressure resilience may cause significant shifts in momentum during the match.

Given these factors, the match is expected to be competitive. However, Bonzi’s historical performance metrics and ability to compete against higher-ranked players give them a slight advantage heading into this encounter. Therefore, Bonzi is the more likely candidate to secure a win in this upcoming match.